BHPC Forum Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Public: Open to anyone > Racing > Etc
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Completely Unfaired class
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Starting a new topic? Please try and put it in a relevant forum (Riding, Building, etc) but if you're not sure it's better to post in any forum than not to post at all.


Topic ClosedCompletely Unfaired class

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 10>
Author
Message
Neil View Drop Down
Visitor (new)
Visitor (new)


Joined: 07 March 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1090
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 November 2005 at 11:22am

Just to throw another spanner into the works. Why does the multitrack class have to be unfaired, this restriction does not apply for the ladies or junior classes. After all, a multitrack vehicle does not suddently become un-multitracked just because it spouts a fairing. I would have thought that developing fairings for trikes and quads is one of the easier areas for people to do at home rather than building full streamliners and the presnt arrangements are effectively stifeling development in this area.

Neil

Back to Top
jes@gcre View Drop Down
BHPC Member
BHPC Member


Joined: 22 March 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 556
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 November 2005 at 11:26am

While the class struggle is going on:

Why can't anything with a fairing be classed as "multitrack"?

What are the thoughts behind that rule?

On the occasions which we had pedal cars racing in the BHPC this year, they were usually the first non-2-wheelers but don't count for multitrack because they are faired.

Dropping that rule might also encourage people to fair Windcheetah's as well (thus making them theoretically faster than pedal cars of course).

Racing is life...
Anything which happens before or afterwards is just standing around waiting to race....
Back to Top
jes@gcre View Drop Down
BHPC Member
BHPC Member


Joined: 22 March 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 556
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 November 2005 at 11:26am

[oops]

Great minds, eh?

Racing is life...
Anything which happens before or afterwards is just standing around waiting to race....
Back to Top
Neil View Drop Down
Visitor (new)
Visitor (new)


Joined: 07 March 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1090
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 November 2005 at 11:29am
Originally posted by jes@gcre jes@gcre wrote:

[oops]

Great minds, eh?

Back to Top
GeoffBird View Drop Down
BHPC Member
BHPC Member
Avatar

Joined: 20 September 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 2396
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 November 2005 at 11:41am

Neil wrote: "I would have thought that developing fairings for trikes and quads is one of the easier areas for people to do at home rather than building full streamliners and the presnt arrangements are effectively stifeling development in this area."

I agree with you, Neil. If you just had a 'practical' and a 'racing' class then a fully-equiped, faired trike could fall into the former category - I argued this abour 3 years ago. The problem is coming up with the rules to define 'practical'...

Back to Top
KevinJ View Drop Down
Committee
Committee
Avatar

Joined: 04 March 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1079
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 November 2005 at 11:52am

Having just spent a silly amount of time just doing a tail fairing I don't know whether I am keen on making a fully faired or front faired bike.  But there probably does need to be something done to the class to inject some energy.  Currently it is undoubtably dying.

Perhaps allowing fairings would make it more competitive (no doubt Rob Hague would be keen) but it would seem more sensible.  I would be keener at allowing those than that having too may groups.  I think we have to be careful about fragmenting groups too much.

Fairings on a trike are generally more practical (day to day) than the fully faired bikes.  Are we thinking of front and rear fairings or full?  Full would bring in the pedal cars into the group (no bad thing).  I (as an unfaired trike) would be keen on this I think - it would certainly inspire the need for more faired bits and hence more speed.

Kevin Jenkins

Windcheetah
Back to Top
AlanGoodman View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar
Club Chairman

Joined: 04 March 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 8036
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 November 2005 at 11:54am
Originally posted by GeoffBird GeoffBird wrote:

Alan Wrote: "I don't think that would do much to encourage more juniors to take part...."

I don't understand, Alan - what do you mean?

I mean that only having two classes wouldn't give Juniors (or ladies or hand-cyclists) much to aim at (as far as championships go anyway)


Back to Top
Neil View Drop Down
Visitor (new)
Visitor (new)


Joined: 07 March 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1090
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 November 2005 at 11:54am

But even under the present rules it makes no sense. If Darren turns up in his car he has to race in open, and is not eligable for multitrack. If we bring a 14 year old girl racing in that car, she is eligable for open, ladies and junior.

Neil

Back to Top
AlanGoodman View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar
Club Chairman

Joined: 04 March 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 8036
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 November 2005 at 11:56am
Originally posted by GeoffBird GeoffBird wrote:

The problem is coming up with the rules to define 'practical'...

Easy... Anything where the riders eyes are above 105cm...


Back to Top
Neil View Drop Down
Visitor (new)
Visitor (new)


Joined: 07 March 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1090
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 November 2005 at 11:59am
Originally posted by KevinJ KevinJ wrote:

Having just spent a silly amount of time just doing a tail fairing I don't know whether I am keen on making a fully faired or front faired bike.  But there probably does need to be something done to the class to inject some energy.  Currently it is undoubtably dying.

Perhaps allowing fairings would make it more competitive (no doubt Rob Hague would be keen) but it would seem more sensible.  I would be keener at allowing those than that having too may groups.  I think we have to be careful about fragmenting groups too much.

Fairings on a trike are generally more practical (day to day) than the fully faired bikes.  Are we thinking of front and rear fairings or full?  Full would bring in the pedal cars into the group (no bad thing).  I (as an unfaired trike) would be keen on this I think - it would certainly inspire the need for more faired bits and hence more speed.

I dont see the need for specifying how much of a fairing is allowed, the whole point is it is multitrack regardless. On a trike you can improve your speed by making a front fairing with a plastic bag and some chicken wire if you have a mind. You can build a full fairing for nothing if you manage to aquire some old political campaign signs.

It would certainly be a logical step and I certainly cant see the point of both a faired and unfaired multitrack class.

Neil

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 10>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.07
Copyright ©2001-2024 Web Wiz Ltd.