| Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
alexjrice
Visitor (regular)
Joined: 05 March 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 119
|
Topic: What would your ideal race bike be like? Posted: 30 April 2005 at 10:35pm |
|
The cost of race bikes is pretty prohibitive to getting people involved
in the sport ~£1200+, I'm thinking of having a go at designing a bike
to bring the cost down toward the £800 mark comparable with a decent
upright.
In essence my idea is a steel copy of an optima low baron using a 700c
rear wheel with v brakes at the back, and a 406 front wheel with a 20mm
axle downhill hub, disc brakes and a steel monoblade fork at the front.
The basic model would use 4130 Chrome-Molybdenum with a lighter version
using a T45 Carbon-Mangenese tube set at additional cost. There is also
the possibility of making it separate under the seat for travel, again
at extra cost and a bit of a weight penalty. The entire bike wouldn't
be particularly light, but most BHPC courses are fairly flat anyway.
Obviously to make things as cheaply as possible the frame would only be
offered in one plain colour of cellulose paint, although I would offer
the frame unpainted for those who wanted to paint it themselves.
It would also be possible to offer the frame in it's just post brazing
state allowing those who wanted to do the laborious hand finishing of the fillet brazing
themselves to save even more money.
If one were to allow £350 for the bicycle components you'd have to be
making the basic frame and forks for around £250 to turn a reasonable
profit. This seems do-able. I already have much of the equipment and
experties (15yrs spent making stuff, 2yrs into an engineering degree)
although making a tube bender would be a considerable investment of
time and money (making the dies being much of the work), as would the
bits and bobs to thread BB's, true frames, face headtubes and so on.
4130 is cheap, and I have summer holidays. I'm pretty happy earning
£5/hr if it's something I enjoy doing so even if it took me three days
to make each frame & forks that's still only ~£135 of labour
leaving £115 for welding gas, materials, seat, idlers etc. and £150
profit for recouping investment in equipment.
The question is, what would you add or change about the specification,
might you go for a highracer instead? FWD and 406 all round? Mid drive
with a 406 RWD? 406 rear and a big chainring? Would you bother with a
monoblade
fork or get an off the shelf BMX fork and have an extra idler? Has
anyone made something like this from scratch before, any hints and
tips, anything you don't like about the low baron anyway, should i
prioritise making it seperable over weight and cost, and so on...
...and if I really made a batch of these things, would anyone buy them
at say £400 for a frameset (F&F,seat, stem, bars and idlers), maybe
£300 if you clean up the joints and paint it yourself? This would mean
you could probably put together an entire bike for £450 if you were
resourceful and scavenged bits off old bikes, or you could have a
really nice machine with new bits for £800.
Edited by alexjrice
|
 |
AlanGoodman
Admin Group
Club Chairman
Joined: 04 March 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 8036
|
Posted: 30 April 2005 at 11:58pm |
Alex...
When me and brother Dave looked at the Barons we found they weren't capable of being adjusted to suit our short legs... With the boom far enough in for us to reach the pedals, the crank fouled the front wheel. Not a huge problem for racing perhaps but we ride on the road as well sometimes...
Challenge make a modified version of the Hurricane that allows shortarses like us out to play.
So we bought Hurricanes.
I reckon if you want to sell lots of bikes it would be a good idea to make them fit a wide range of people...
By the way, I'm no lawyer, but are you sure that stating in public that you intend to blag a design off Optima is a great idea??...
Judging by the speed at which Mr Flemming came past me (about 99 times) at Castle Coombe I reckon you might be better off blagging a design from Velokraft.
Best of luck.
Alan.
Edited by AlanGoodman
|
|
|
 |
alexjrice
Visitor (regular)
Joined: 05 March 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 119
|
Posted: 01 May 2005 at 2:00am |
I think it's OK to say that the design will be based on another
manufacturers product, so long as I don't call it an optima baron when
(if) I sell it. It won't be an exact copy anyway, not least because
I've never seen one in the flesh. The reason i was looking at it was
that their general design of rear stays looks easier to fabricate en
masse than other designs, although it may end up looking a bit more
moulton-esque with a bit more triangulation
The low baron has it's BB quite a bit higher than the standard one
which gives a lot more clearance between the cranks and the front
wheel, I'm pretty tall but of course I'll bear ikle people in mind as
well  The solution for really short
people might be to go to a 16" front wheel in a 20" fork with a bit of
extra 'headtube' to keep everything at the right height but gaining a
lot of extra clearance. Indeed, why do lowracers not use 16" front
wheels? Any ideas?
I'm set up for making things from metal, rather than carbon fibre which
is a whole different kettle of fish and something with which i have
almost no experience. I suppose the setup costs are somewhat less but
the development cost will be higher because of the dificulty of
reworking a mould. If you get it wrong you have to scrap the whole
thing rather than whipping out the torch and the hacksaw for a quick
bit of 'adjustment'!
|
 |
AlanGoodman
Admin Group
Club Chairman
Joined: 04 March 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 8036
|
Posted: 01 May 2005 at 8:01am |
I would guess that the reason for going for 20" wheels over 16" may be the availability of decent high pressure tyres...
The two bikes Dave has built for our daughters to race this year both have 16" wheels on the front and the only reasonable tyres we've been able to find are the ones designed for the new Raleigh Chopper... They are ok but a bit fat and only 50 psi or so.
I have seen high pressure tyres for Bromptons advertised but they won't fit the girl's rims.
If anybody knows of better tyres that size (305 rather than 349), please let us know!!
Challenge get around the shortie problem by making a frame with the front wheel placed a couple of inches further back. This obviously shortens the wheelbase a bit so they recommend that you use the longer swinging arm from the Hurricane "Tour" rather than the "Sport" to avoid the handling being too lively/twitchy.
|
|
|
 |
gNick
BHPC Member
Joined: 22 February 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1977
|
Posted: 01 May 2005 at 8:34pm |
|
In no particular order:-
I'm not convinced by the Baron's handling and Mr Larrington seems to have dropped his too often for me to be sold on it.
The best thing to do is knock something up, to get a geometry that
suits you AND like-minded victims/friends. Don't worry about the weight
and sexiness , you need to have something that works first, then you
make it so it looks the biz.
With a composite bike the frame can be hacked and patched reasonably
easily. I would recommend starting with a wrap around a foam core first
though to get everything worked out, then making the moulds.
Alan, why not rebuild the wheels for 349 and you can get Stelvios? A no help answer I know but hey I'm that kind of guy...
|
|
gNick
"I'm afraid it's definite, Mrs Banker - your son has bicycles"
|
 |
AlanGoodman
Admin Group
Club Chairman
Joined: 04 March 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 8036
|
Posted: 01 May 2005 at 10:37pm |
That's a good thought... I'll pass it on to the family bike builder...
Ta very much.
|
|
|
 |
alexjrice
Visitor (regular)
Joined: 05 March 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 119
|
Posted: 02 May 2005 at 12:43am |
|
Looking at the baron in comparison to other bikes (jester, no com) they
all seem to have the same head angle, the main differences are that the
baron has about a 4" shorter wheelbase and the seat about 3" further
back than the jester. This is going to mean that the weight balance
will be more to the rear which could possibly result in the front wheel
washing out and also with a shorter wheelbase the handling will be
slightly quicker.
The baron has the BB about 6" higher than the jester so should be
better aerodynamically. In relation to the seat the no-com's BB is
similar to the jester.
Seat angle is pretty much the same between all three.
Alan, Marathons come in 305, they're not as fast as stelvios but
they're not bad and will take something like 90psi. A good stop-gap
measure.
|
 |
AlanGoodman
Admin Group
Club Chairman
Joined: 04 March 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 8036
|
Posted: 02 May 2005 at 7:46am |
Thanks Alex.
I'll have a look at those as well.
Hmmmmmm... I can see it won't be too long before I end up geting lapped by two eleven year olds....
|
|
|
 |
dave
BHPC Member
Joined: 04 March 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 95
|
Posted: 02 May 2005 at 11:08am |
|
Alex,
Great idea to lure new riders/racers with a cheaper
bike. However, I wonder if a 'pure race' machine like
the Low Baron is the best design. I'm thinking there is a bigger market for a 'sport' type bike, which is practical for road use as well as racing. £800 is still alot of money for a bike you're only going to ride 12 times a year!
Best of luck!
|
|
I want to give peace, love and kisses out to this whole stinking world!
|
 |
alexjrice
Visitor (regular)
Joined: 05 March 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 119
|
Posted: 02 May 2005 at 5:11pm |
|
Yes, I was thinking about that. I think it would be better to have the
BB a little lower than the baron, and have the seat adjustable for a
less reclined position. I rekon that should make it rideable on the
road for training purposes at least, and it will definitely have
provision for mudguards and bottle bosses, but probably not a luggage
rack.
I ride a Catrike Speed on busy roads and even a lowracer is quite a bit
higher than that, and I've not had any problems. I'll make it as
practical as possible without diluting it as a race machine.
Given the limited initial production capacity (ie. me) the size of the
market is not as critical as it might be. Once I've made a few then I
may look to diversify, <fantasy> if it were to ever really take
off to the point where I could do it full time and had enough money to
invest in a CNC milling machine to make dropouts etc. then I'd like to
have a stab at making an uber-utilitarian 'bent </fantasy> but
until then I'd be chuffed if I made and sold a dozen.
|
 |