| Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
SotonHPV
Visitor (new)
Joined: 06 January 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 5
|
Topic: Measuring Power Input Posted: 16 February 2006 at 4:56pm |
Firstly, thank you to all those who have shared information with us so far, it has been much appreciated and we are endevouring to follow up on all of the replies.
We are getting reading to test our old bike to validate the predicted results from the last project group. However in order to do this fully we need some method of measuring the power input from the rider.
We have found some rather expensive methods of doing this, such as the "Pedal Crank" and a chain vibration sensor made by "Pulse" but at hundreds (and more) these are not really viable for us to buy at this stage.
Does anyone have any information or ideas on measuring the power input from the rider? Such as a cheaper method or someone who might lend us some equipement. If so we would be very greatfull to hear from you!
Many thanks
Southampton University HPV Team
|
 |
Paul Lowing
Visitor (regular)
Joined: 23 March 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1264
|
Posted: 16 February 2006 at 6:58pm |
|
Have you seen the spreadsheet tools here http://www.ihpva.org/tools/index.html ?
There are some ways of calculating power input without expensive gizmos.
|
 |
gNick
BHPC Member
Joined: 22 February 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1977
|
Posted: 16 February 2006 at 8:40pm |
|
The Kingcycle trainer worked using a large flywheel to simulate the rider's momentum and it was the industry standard for quite a long time. Some useful info at http://www.kingcycle.co.uk/index.html which should allow you to construct your own - or you could always contact them.
|
|
gNick
"I'm afraid it's definite, Mrs Banker - your son has bicycles"
|
 |
alexjrice
Visitor (regular)
Joined: 05 March 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 119
|
Posted: 18 February 2006 at 10:51pm |
|
Well, I'm sure you could rig something up, you could copy Polar's idea
with the chain tension sensor using a derailleur jockey wheel and a
balance or load cell.
Or you could knock up a turbo trainer type arrangement to measure the
power at the back wheel, you could use a PM dc motor, a resistive load
and a load cell - measure torque and angular speed and compute power.
|
 |
kit wolf
Visitor (regular)
Joined: 23 March 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 220
|
Posted: 19 February 2006 at 8:31pm |
Are you trying to measure your rider's power output directly, or would it be enough to determine the power required to sustain various speeds in a given vehicle?
Obviously the two values should be pretty close, but I can see why the distinction might be important.
Kit
|
 |
kit wolf
Visitor (regular)
Joined: 23 March 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 220
|
Posted: 21 February 2006 at 1:59am |
p.s. I have an idea on how to accomplish the latter quite easily, but not the former.
Kit
|
 |
SotonHPV
Visitor (new)
Joined: 06 January 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 5
|
Posted: 21 February 2006 at 10:31am |
Our original thought was to measure the rider's power output directly during the testing of the bike. This seems however to be very difficult.
After some thought, i came to the conclusion that the rider has to overcome all the inefficiencies in order to move the bike so whether you measure the power input by the rider at the crank, or by using the polar chain sensor i previously described or off the back wheel the values should all in fact be the same.
However after considering one of the power calculation spreadsheets on the ihpva website, it suggests the pedal power and the wheel power, if could be measured seperately, would be different. Which also makes sense, but contradicts the statement above.
So in conclusion we are still at the same point, either measure the power directly, or measure the power at the wheel and estimate the inefficiencies in the system to predict the input power.
How would you determine the power required to sustain various speeds in a given vehicle, and could it be used to log the power during a test of the bike?
On behalf of the SUHPV team, thanks,
Alex
|
 |
graydog
BHPC Member
Joined: 16 January 2006
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 1481
|
Posted: 21 February 2006 at 11:04am |
As an idea if you really want to measure the riders force on the cranks.
stick strain gauges to the crank arms and measure the loading force? If the cranks are to stiff cut some metals out of the centre.
Ok, this would have wire to attach and it is going round, Problem!!!
Connect the SG in a wheatstone bridge, fed the signal in to a small micro-controller and post the data to memory or use an rf transmitter to feed a bench top analyser (like labview /matlab).
As I see it, the problems are speed of data acquisition, ensuring the resolution of the ADC is good. With cadence up to 2 ~2.5Hz you will have to work out for how long the power is on for, there mush be figures about for this. I would be guessing any thing form 30deg BTDC to about the same after, unless the rider is pulling also, the rest of the cycle should be null or there about.
2.5Hz is 400ms which sounds like a lot of time, but divide that by 360 gives 1.1ms per deg. whilst a good ADC can easily cope with this time frame, one must look at the bigger picture. Can the system? Workout your tolerance require and get the maximum time frame you can to make your life easier.
The system can be calibrated using weights.
There are some ideas using accelerometers (ACC) which may be of interest also as the ACC can be used to determine D2y/Dx2, which is related to force. Gluing a pair of devices again with microcontroller would provide this data.
Have a chat with your electronics dept, failing that given me a shout.
anyway ths just some ideas which may help
Gd
|
 |
GeoffBird
BHPC Member
Joined: 20 September 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 2396
|
Posted: 21 February 2006 at 11:21am |
SotonHPV wrote: "After some thought, i came to the conclusion that the rider has to overcome all the inefficiencies in order to move the bike so whether you measure the power input by the rider at the crank, or by using the polar chain sensor i previously described or off the back wheel the values should all in fact be the same."
The power at the rear tyre will be the rider output multiplied by the transmission efficiency, usually about 98%. I doubt that your estimates will be within 2% anyway, so I wouldn't worry about it.
You really need to know the rider's power output independent of a moving vehicle (It's notoriously difficult (inacurate) to extrapolate power from moving bike performance data). Then having found out the CdA (wind tunnel) and rolling resistance of your vehicle you can work out how fast it might go, assuming you can solve polynomials (I can't ). Have you seen John Lafford's stuff on Legs Larry's website?
In my very limited experience and that of others, successful record breaking is as much about logistics (and a bit of luck) as it is about vehicle technology.
Edited by GeoffBird
|
|
Right Time - Right Place - Wrong Speed
|
 |
NickM
BHPC Member
Joined: 18 August 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1926
|
Posted: 21 February 2006 at 1:36pm |
I think you might do better by measuring the power output of the rider - something which is straightforward for any exercise physiology lab. Does Southampton offer Sports Science?
Although the design of the bike and fairing is very important (as the Blue Yonder story shows), the current records are pretty good and will not be beaten except by exceptional athletes.
Just guessing really, but I wonder whether the women's records might not be more vulnerable than the men's?
(edited for typo)
Edited by NickM
|
 |