GeoffBird wrote:
Antony wrote "Blimey, it seems I've agreed with Geoff."
Careful, Antony, it's getting a dangerously regular occurrence.  |
Sorry, I'll try to avoid it in future.
KevinJ wrote:
It does not seem unresasonable to me that a person selects one (class), in each of (the machine- and rider-specific groups of classes) that they wish to complete in and that is selected at registration time. That way super fit lady arm cyclist on a sports bike doesn't win ALL the classes. this would make it fairer.
...
It would mean a more diverse group of people winning prizes but would mean more people in the class really competing against each other. |
If a super fit junior lady arm cyclist on a sports trike wins a race outright, in what way is it fair that she should not take maximum points and silver (plastic?) -ware in open, sports, female, junior, multitrack and arm-powered classes?
She has beaten everyone else in each of those classes; giving maximum points to a runner-up because Ms X has already won one class seems a bit daft.
Having to specify your sole class at registration (when at least some people will not know who, if anyone, else will be in that class) would actually reduce the numbers in every class by removing the overlaps. You could also inadvertently take a "win" by being the last, e.g., multitrack, if the other half dozen multitracks at the race had chosen to race for different classes (either before or after you registered).