![]() |
Starting a new topic? Please try and put it in a relevant forum (Riding, Building, etc) but if you're not sure it's better to post in any forum than not to post at all. |
|
Post Reply
|
Page 123> |
| Author | |
frisby
Visitor (new)
Joined: 16 March 2005 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 4 |
Topic: T.V. coveragePosted: 12 September 2005 at 1:24pm |
|
He was from the B.B.C. Look North programme - the local news - and you might be pleased to know that the club got a brief showing on the local news on Sunday Evening. It was also pleasing to note that several people had turned up to watch the races after seeing a piece in a local paper.(Lincolnshire Echo ?) I wonder if the same sort of publicity should be tried more often. There was such talk at the last A.G.M. Steve Frisby #109 -the slowest of all. |
|
|
frisby
|
|
![]() |
|
LeeW
BHPC Member
Joined: 10 March 2005 Location: Grimsby Status: Offline Points: 2382 |
Posted: 12 September 2005 at 2:56pm |
|
I missed the TV coverage (if anyone has it on a DVD or VHS, please contact me). Was I there? I'd like all the publicity avalible. Something I'd like to see more oftern is races run in conjunction with other races like at Curbrough 2002. I went to see the Otley Criterium races earlier this year and there were several races around the town center, ones for under 16's, juniors, vetrans, elites and women but all on UCI bikes, I thought about how nice it would be if there was a 'bent race thrown in too. OK, I will stop the wishful thinking now. |
|
|
Current fleet: Milan SL MK2 #027, Fujin SL II, Beany!
|
|
![]() |
|
gNick
BHPC Member
Joined: 22 February 2005 Status: Offline Points: 1977 |
Posted: 12 September 2005 at 3:23pm |
|
We generally try to avoid these sort of events because we end up being bumped around as a sort of comedy turn. The Curborough one ended up getting too popular with the roadie types so our available room shrank to impractical. This is generally a problem with these crit series events since they are usually working to get as many people in as possible and unless we are involved at the very beginning we end up as a filler. I am thinking to see if we can get accepted by the CTT (formerly RTTC) at least on a club time trial basis so we could possibly have a chance to play with roadies. As a means of measuring our level of performance and not to draw attention to their outdated machinery of course! It has to be said that this is likely to be a dead loss but you can but try... |
|
|
gNick
"I'm afraid it's definite, Mrs Banker - your son has bicycles" |
|
![]() |
|
LeeW
BHPC Member
Joined: 10 March 2005 Location: Grimsby Status: Offline Points: 2382 |
Posted: 12 September 2005 at 4:02pm |
That would be very nice, It means I could finally dispense with my roadie bike (which only really gets ridden to do local TT's). I somehow have a feeling it wont happen though. They do allow (upright)tandems and (upright)trikes though so why there is no "room" for bents is beyond me. If you look at the records, you will see mens solo, womens solo, junior, tandems, (upright) trikes etc. There is a blank space below that where Mens recumbent bicycle, Womans recumbent bicycle, Mens recumbent tricycle, and Womans recumbent tricycle would fit. |
|
|
Current fleet: Milan SL MK2 #027, Fujin SL II, Beany!
|
|
![]() |
|
LeeW
BHPC Member
Joined: 10 March 2005 Location: Grimsby Status: Offline Points: 2382 |
Posted: 12 September 2005 at 4:29pm |
|
I have just been looking at the rules, it simply says "The use of recumbent machines, protective shields, windbreaks or other means of reducing air resistance is prohibited" It does not attempt to define the word "recumbent". Would a Giant revive, rans fusion or simular bike which lays in the gray area between recumbent and not recumbent be allowd in a CTT event? Apparently when Bike-E first came to the market, they claimed their bikes were not recumbent, the word "recumbent" according to www.dictionary.com, means "adj Lying down, especially in a position of comfort or rest; reclining". I would not call the position on a Bike-E lying down. |
|
|
Current fleet: Milan SL MK2 #027, Fujin SL II, Beany!
|
|
![]() |
|
antony
Visitor (regular)
Joined: 07 March 2005 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 667 |
Posted: 12 September 2005 at 5:46pm |
I suspect you'd get classed as an "other mean" of reducing air resistance. However, I notice there is neither a definition of what "standard" air resistance is, nor what sort of machine would posses such an amount of air resistance. I also guess that faired wheels, tri bars, skin suits, shaped helmets, etc, all means of reducing air resistance, are presumably permitted. All a bit silly really but not too surprising - when we've looked at making any rule more specific (such as a faired and unfaired class) we've found it impossibly difficult to come up with rules that one couldn't circumvent pretty easily. Edited by antony |
|
![]() |
|
Paul Lowing
Visitor (regular)
Joined: 23 March 2005 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1264 |
Posted: 12 September 2005 at 5:46pm |
|
The mention on Look North must have been restricted to the Lincoln area
because it certainly wasn't on Look North in West Yorks...
As to riding a BikeE or Giant Revive etc. in a TT... the word WHY??!! comes strongly to mind. |
|
![]() |
|
Neil
Visitor (new)
Joined: 07 March 2005 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1090 |
Posted: 12 September 2005 at 6:00pm |
Excellent - all media coverage is good in our experience. Neil |
|
![]() |
|
AlanGoodman
Admin Group
Club Chairman Joined: 04 March 2005 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 8036 |
Posted: 12 September 2005 at 6:04pm |
|
Oh I dunno... We haven't had any trouble with Sports Class... |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
LeeW
BHPC Member
Joined: 10 March 2005 Location: Grimsby Status: Offline Points: 2382 |
Posted: 12 September 2005 at 6:28pm |
|
Comfort and speed?? I find my flat-bar touring DF bad enougth but the position on some of the TT bikes I have seen looks like somekind of evil touture. Surley those silly helmets TT riders wear (which are not really helmets, they are just a fairing and would do squat in the event of a crash) would violate the "other means of reducing air resistance is prohibited" rule?
|
|
|
Current fleet: Milan SL MK2 #027, Fujin SL II, Beany!
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page 123> |
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |