Rules and Regualtions For E-Bikes

Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic

    Alan Goodman wrote:

"What we’re saying is that the very small group of people who organise our events are
 not prepared 
 to risk their homes when they become personally
 liable because an event is not insured.

At the moment it is not possible for us to guarantee to the insurers that not everyone 
 who turns up
 with an electric motor is going to play by the rules."
On behalf of the BHPC Committee

So what happens when a rule is broken now? Does the person organising become financially responsible given that we rely on the honesty of our members racing to say whether a motor is working or not? We are allowing e-bikes to be on the track. It seems to me that it's a question of trust here. Like we trust people not to ride having taken drugs or cheat any other way. There seems to be a forgotten fact that faired bikes are faster than electrically assisted ones anyway. The MTB clubs must have sorted the issue to the satisfaction of their insurers otherwise they could not be holding e-bike races.

Kim said
"The problem is how we, as in whoever's organising the race on the day (who doesn't necessarily know anything about ebikes, and is otherwise busy worrying about the sign-on list and first aid kits and extension leads and who's got the key to the gate and so on), determine whether a given system actually complies with that standard, given that in some cases the difference between a legal motor and a non-legal motor is a software setting.  We simply don't now how to police this effectively.  It's easy enough to disqualify someone who achieves an unrealistic speed on the track, but they've already invalidated our insurance by that point."
Kim, No e-bike goes faster than the Beano, are we going to disqualify Steve because he goes too fast. No, don't reply to that!
All the best.
Roy